Self Analysis
How
professional is your own approach to management? Reflect on how
your own approach accords with the twelve statements listed below
by means of the following scoring scale:
5 |
Almost entirely true |
4 |
Definitely more true than
false |
3 |
Slightly more true than false |
2 |
Slightly more false than true |
1 |
Definitely more false than
true |
0 |
Almost entirely false |
There is a clearly defined strategy
for ensuring processes and people are customer focused, and their
is active management of the progress and effectiveness of it |
|
Customer satisfaction is regularly
measured and improved, and there is clear evidence of increasing
partnership with the customers in terms of joint teamworking. |
|
The performance goals and improvement
targets are very much in evidence both visually and in routine
communications. It is clear that they are everyone's priority. |
|
There is a clear strategy to value
the 'right' behaviours, and management actively support this
by analysing the issues and developing clear plans to address
behaviours as appropriate |
|
There is a clearly defined strategy
for using challenges and training to develop the competence of
the department, and performance against this is measured |
|
There is clear evidence that the
Mgr has coaching plans and records for his/her direct reports
and regularly coaches them in the development of management skills
and attitudes |
|
Key business processes are well
defined, and in control. Up to date maps or schematics exist,
there is clear guidance for those working in them, and there
is recent audit data |
|
There is clear evidence of project
work to systematically improve process performance and quality.
Performance is monitored & problem solving tools used to
address issues. |
|
There is prominent visible evidence
of the measurement and trending of current performance in all
key areas. Quadrant charts are well used and result in clear
improvements. |
|
There is evidence that the quality
& availability of information is regularly audited, &
reviews regularly used to analyse weaknesses and improve the
quality of future decisions |
|
There is regular seeking of ideas
and solutions from outside of the dept/process, and clear evidence
of their evaluation and implementation into the practices of
the dept/process |
|
There is a clear mechanisms for
seeking & encouraging improvement at all levels of the dept/process,
and evidence of active promotion of the concept of continuous
improvement |
|
The total score is out of 60,
but there is no intention to propose any spurious automated conclusions
on your score. The intention was only to provide you with a means
to reflect on your own areas of strength and weakness by considering
the the statements in the context of your own organisation.
If you would like a paper version
of the self analysis form, complete with a more detailed explanation
of the statements this can be downloaded from the resources
section, or by clicking here
(86 KB Acrobat file)
Home - Load
frames - About us - Resources
- Contact us
© Tesseract
Management Systems Ltd 2003
|
|
Fast Perspectives:
(click below for an oversight) Making alliances
work
(case study) Case studies of success: transforming organisational
performance through QFD
Managing by Design
- a handbook of
Systematic Mgt.
(purchase on line) QFD: Making your
vision reality
(insight) Excellence through systematic management:
a brief overview of Tesseract's approach
(insight) Testimonials on systematic management
|